Just a quick one today, as clear examples of gaslighting and deceptive rhetorical sleight-of-hand with strawman arguments are rarely this clear.
This is a doxxing threat by galneon impacting me and one other person.
Something important to know about me: I have two long-term stalkers offline, one of whom has attempted to strangle me to death. I have reasons to preserve my anonymity directly related to that, something known to galneon and Steven Jarvis.
Note that while I know galneon’s full name and other identifying information, I am not publishing it here nor will I threaten to do so. Law enforcement has that data, and what happens with it now is a matter for law enforcement to determine, not a bunch of assholes on the internet.
Once the threat has been made I have no choice but to behave as though I know it has been carried out for reasons of my physical safety, because it is not some game for abusive LARPers on the internet.
That risk has always been the truth.
This is especially the case when the doxxing threat is made by someone who is known to have doxxed others before to the same collection of abusive cyberstalkers.
And have bragged about it.
Within 48 hours, the quote shown here — with privacy redactions regarding the names of other women — below appeared in this substack post by Steven Jarvis.
As stated above: galneon’s threat means I have no choice but to behave as though my full information has been shared with the group of people they have shared such information with in the past from the moment it was made if not before that.
I noted this as interesting here:
Not exactly complicated.
The claim made in the tweet is objectively true: the screenshots above with the red borders indicate the first time Steven Jarvis has publicly admitted his identification of me as various other women could be wrong, and it is within 48 hours of the doxxing threat from galneon.
It is an objective fact.
Are these things connected?
I don’t know.
As stated above: galneon’s threat means I have no choice but to behave as though my full information has been shared with the group of people they have shared such information with in the past from the moment it was made if not before that.
More telling should be Steven Jarvis’ attempt to gaslight his audience by pretending otherwise here:
Still Deanna, not S* or K*.
I have never made any pretense of being either of these women, or any of the other people he has accused me of being over the past two years.
I still don’t give a damn what he thinks about my art or knowledge base.
No ‘feigned attempts’ at anything have been made here; there are simply not enough hours in the day for that kind of time-wasting nonsense. Brandolini’s Law is already the dominant principle of my life for the past three years, and that shit is exhausting.
I don’t care what you believe, Steven, I care that you lie about me like it’s your actual job.
I have never played World of Warcraft.
I’ve never claimed to play World of Warcraft — to M* D* or anyone else.
K*R*B* is not my blog.
I have never claimed that K*R*B* is my blog.
I have never registered a domain under any name other than my own.
I have nothing to fear from law enforcement regarding any and all of the above because these things are verifiably true to the only legitimate authorities that matter at this point. (Read: not random assholes on the internet.)
So, now that we have his gish gallop out of the way?
Once more for all the fine people in the back: galneon’s threat means I have no choice but to behave as though my full information has been shared with the group of people they have shared such information with in the past from the moment it was made if not before that.
galenon chose to ring that bell.
It cannot be unrung.
This is a matter for the legitimate authorities at this point, not the people who spend their time pretending to be legitimate authorities on the internet.
Now, the gaslighting:
Here we have another gish gallop to address:
His entire CSAM narrative is fiction.
It is likely no one on the planet wants proper legal forensic investigation of that image more than I do.
I have already publicly and privately offered all of my devices and internet records to legitimate law enforcement authorities and those same authorities have the equally legitimate records of this in web form, email, and in a telephone conversation recorded on their end with my fully informed consent.
I remain in no way afraid of law enforcement personally or professionally and continue to implore them to take action regarding this matter.
This is tiresome, y’all.
Computer, enhance!
Oh, really?
100% gaslighting.
His attempt to deflect attention from this coincidence through a variety of deceptive and manipulative tactics is considerably more telling than the coincidence itself.